Using Social Media to Combat Climate Change

Social media can be a potent weapon in the war against climate change. We are living in any age where hundreds of millions (if not several billion) people globally are using social media on a day to day basis. Whether it is Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Telegram, Whatsapp or the Chinese Weibo, social media platforms attract numerous users on a day to day basis. That is a huge audience that we can tap into, to recruit more soldiers in the war against climate change.

Some of the people who use social media are workers/staff who log into their social media accounts in between tasks or during their break times. You could, for instance, be looking at someone who works at CVS Health. So you find that upon getting to the office at 9 Am, he focuses on work tasks, right up to 11 Am. Then in between 11 Am and 11.30 Am, he takes a brief break, in the course of which he signs into his social media accounts. He therefore ends up spending most of his free time on social media. And that turns out to be the routine for many other workers.

In practical terms, while using social media to combat climate change, we will need to:

  1. Identify the specific social media platforms we will be using in the exercise: there are, for instance, some messages that are best passed through Twitter. There are others that would be most appropriately passed through Facebook or Whatsapp posts. So you just identify the best social media platform for the sort of message you are seeking to pass.
  2. Craft the messages we are to use in combating climate change: the messages need to be simple, with strong calls to action incorporated.
  3. Post the messages onto the social media platforms:  here, the most important thing is to identify the strategies we are to use, to ensure that the message actually reaches the targeted people through the social media platforms.

The Relationship Between Plastics and Climate Change Explained

We are often told that we need to cut back on the usage of plastics, if we want to mitigate the effects of climate change. This brings up an interesting question, as to what the relationship between the plastics and climate chance is. And that relationship, between plastics and climate change, is what we will be attempting to explain in today’s article.

Firstly, it is worth mentioning that plastics are derived from petroleum. And as we all know, petroleum, which is one of the fossil fuels, is a major contributor to climate change.

Secondly, we have to mention that the process of deriving plastics from petroleum is one that results in lots of carbon emissions. The carbon emissions then lead to climate change.

Thirdly, it is important to take note of the fact that the plastics have a tendency to worsen the effects of climate change (or rather, to make the effects of climate change even more obvious). For instance, it is a well established fact that when plastics get into waterways, they clog them up, leading to exacerbated flooding. On the other hand, we also know that one of the effects of climate change is that of more frequent (and worse) floods. So now when you combine the flooding that is as a result of climate change with that which is a result of plastics clogging up the drainage systems, you end up with truly catastrophic results.  And that is how you end up with a situation where, at times, the roads get so badly flooded that people can’t get to work. Yet, for instance, if you work for an organization like CVS Health, the management is unlikely to take the excuse that you were late to (or absent from) work because of flooded roads. So you end up getting a negative appraisal at the mycvshr portal, all because of flooding that was initially caused by climate change and worsened by plastics clogging up the drainage systems.

Characteristics of a Good Climate Change Activist

What goes into the making of a good climate change activist? If, for instance, you were recruiting people to work in climate change advocacy roles, what qualities would you be looking for? Those are some of the questions we will be answering in today’s article. And without further ado, we come to learn that some of the qualities that go into the making of a good climate change activist include:

  1. Proper information: a good climate change activist is one who is armed with solid facts and figures (about climate change). This is a person who is able to demonstrate how climate change is affecting humanity presently, and how things are likely to get worse with time. Thus, a good climate change activist is one who has, at his fingertips, the facts and figures capable of impacting the minds of even the worst climate change skeptics.
  2. Good storytelling skills: a good climate change activist is one who is able to use his storytelling skills to get people to see how the climate change facts and figures are likely to affect them personally and directly.
  3. Good listening skills: a good climate change activist is one who is able to listen well to the questions posed by the people he addresses, and come up with appropriate answers to address their concerns.
  4. Patience: a good climate change activist knows that he may not be able to convince hardcore skeptics in one day. He therefore approaches advocacy work with lots of patience.
  5. Conviction: a good climate change activist is one who is driven by conviction, rather than one who does advocacy for the sake of money. He is the sort of person who would engage in climate change advocacy even if he didn’t stand to derive a direct personal gain from it. He is, for instance, the sort of person who is even willing to forego things like the Capital One getmyoffer, in favor of climate change advocacy work. That is to say he is the sort of person who is willing to continue doing climate change advocacy work, even if he knows that by doing so, he would be ineligible to, say, apply for credit cards at getmyoffer.capitalone.com. Conversely, the worst person you can work with is a climate change activist (or any other sort of activist) who lacks conviction in the cause he is advocating for.

Getting Citizens to Sign a Petition on Climate Change Mitigation

As an anti-climate change campaigner, you may get to a point where you decide to present a petition to the local government authorities. This is likely to be the case if it becomes clear that the local government authorities are not taking climate change mitigation seriously. Now if your petition is to be taken seriously by the local government authorities, you need to ensure that it is signed by a huge number of citizens. If you are in a democratic state, and you present a petition that is signed by many citizens, the authorities will have no choice but to consider the issues raised in the petition – or otherwise risk facing the voters’ wrath in the next elections.

The petition has to be one that makes a great deal of sense, if at all the citizens are to append their signatures on it. Ideally, the petition should be drafted in simple language. The issues in it need to be presented in a manner that enables the citizens to see what is in it for themselves. The language used in the petition has to be respectful, yet also quite assertive. This way, when it reaches the local government authorities, they will be inclined to act on it.

You will need to educate the citizens on the importance of the climate change issues raised in your petition, if at all you are to get them to append their signatures to it. You can opt to use the local media, to educate the citizens on the importance of the climate change-related issues raised in the petition. Alternatively, you can opt to call the citizens individually (say, on phone) and try to educate each one of them individually on the importance of the issues raised in the petition. Such a phone-based campaign need not be very expensive. Going by the calling rates indicated on the metro pcs pay bill online chart, you should be able to push this sort of campaign through with just a few hundred bucks. That is, if you are using Metro PCS services – though the applicable rates for other phone networks tend to be largely similar. Of course, the exact expenditure to be incurred depends on the number of people you will be calling. If you (assisted by your volunteers) opt to call tens of thousands of citizens (or more), you should be ready to make a metro pcs payment that is commensurate with the number of calls made. But whatever the expenditure, it is likely to be a small price to pay – especially if that is what it takes to get the government to support climate change mitigation.

Using the Climate Change Crisis to Earn Money

 Whenever matters to do with climate change are discussed, folks tend to start getting bored immediately. They view it as one of those abstract topics, without much immediate benefit to them. Yet unknown to them is the fact there are many ways in which they can derive personal benefit from it. We have always been advised to ensure that we don’t let any crisis go to waste – and the climate change crisis is no exception. You can use the climate change crisis to earn money (and thereby ensure that it doesn’t go to waste). Some of the specific ways in which you can get to earn money through the climate change crisis include:

Through green energy initiatives

Thanks to the climate change crisis, there is a lot of focus on green energy. Therefore, if you can set up a solar power plant (or a wind power plant), that would be an ideal way to earn some revenue for yourself. Alternatively, you can farming bio-fuels. There are lots of grants that you may access, to help you in getting started. And you are unlikely to face major hurdles in getting your solar (or wind) power into the grid.

By positioning yourself to earn the carbon credits cash

This is where, for instance, you can set up a community-based organization, involved in planting trees to mitigate climate change effects. Then you can apply for the organization to be funded through carbon credits, if your nation is one of those that qualify for carbon credits finance.

Through climate change education initiatives

This is where you can set up a community-based organization (or something else along those lines) to help in educating people about climate change. Then you’d have a chance to tap into various climate change grants, to finance the organization’s activities.

Whatever method you opt to use, the most important thing is to ensure that you show true commitment to climate change mitigation. If you truly apply yourself in a genuine manner, you may end up earning more (through the climate change-related initiatives) than what you’d have earned elsewhere. You can definitely earn more than what you’d have gotten working somewhere in the corporate world or in a service provision position. For instance, through these initiatives, you may get to earn more than what you’d have gotten working at the local Darden restaurant (and therefore having to get your paystubs through the Darden HR portal, at krowd.darden.com).  Furthermore, if you are truly passionate about matters to do with climate change, this would be an opportunity for you to earn money doing something you really care about. That, surely, would be different from having to visit the krowd portal, to check your work schedules: knowing that you are scheduled to perform routine restaurant tasks you are not particularly passionate about.

All said and done, the opportunity to earn money through climate change mitigation initiatives is not for everyone. But for folks who are truly passionate about climate change mitigation, it can be a viable opportunity.

Understanding the Workings of the Green Climate Fund

The Green Climate Fund was set up in 2010, with the primary objective of helping developing nations to adapt to climate change (and to mitigate the effects of climate change in developing nations). It is important to note that climate change tends to have very devastating effects on developing nations. Yet the developing nations’ contribution to the problem is very modest. That is the case, given the fact that climate change is said to be caused (primarily) by greenhouse gas emissions. And as we all know, it is from the developed nations that most of the greenhouse gas emissions come from. On the other hand, it is the developing nations that end up having to bear the brunt of the resultant climate change. And on another note, the developing nations’ financial ability to cope with the effects of climate change is very limited. That is what necessitated the formation of the Green Climate Fund.

The way the Green Climate Fund works is such that developed nations contribute funds to it. The fund operates under the auspices of the UN system, as part of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

The Green Climate Fund has not been without controversy. There are people who feel that the assistance offered through the fund is too modest, compared to the devastation caused by climate change in developing nations. You have to appreciate that the people in developing nations mostly live off the land. They till the land, raise animals on the land, hunt, collect honey from beehives… and so on. Life there is very different compared to developed nations. The average citizen in a developed nation has a job (or a government-backed safety net) to fall back on – no matter what. He may, for instance, be a US Postal Service employee, assured of a livelihood as long as his work schedule at the liteblue usps portal is full. On a day to day basis, the said employee just has to visit the usps liteblue employee login page, sign in, and check his work schedule. As long as there is some work for him, he is assured of a paycheck. Even if there is no work, there are government safety nets – including welfare and food stamps – to fall back on. But in the developing nations, it is survival for the fittest. Yet those developing nations are the ones that bear the greatest brunt from climate change: their economic fragility notwithstanding.

Examining the Effect of Climate Change on Tourism

Climate change is having a negative effect on tourism around the world. This puts the livelihoods of millions of people who depend on tourism at risk. You have to appreciate that there are nation’s whose entire economies are dependent on tourism. Thus anything that threatens tourism turns out to be a national security threat in such nations. And for sure, climate change is threatening tourism by among other things:

  1. Altering ecosystems: thus, for instance, in nations where there used to be lots of wild animals to be viewed by tourists, the numbers have dwindled. In some places, there are actually no wild animals remaining – sounding a death knell to the local tourism industries. The same applies even for marine life. That is where, due to climate change — and the resultant changes in ecosystems — places that used to have rich and attractive marine life now have none. Also at risk are some seaside tourist attractions, that are at risk of sinking/disappearing due to rising sea levels caused by climate change.
  2. Making the weather less predictable: this makes it hard to move tourists from one point to another. You also have to understand that there are tourists who move around in search of friendlier weather conditions. There are, for instance, tourists who flee from the cold (during the winter) to places that are likely to be warmer. Then, due to climate change, you find that places that used to be warmer during certain months are now colder and vice versa. This messes up tourism.
  3. Introducing conflicts where previously there was peace: tourism thrives where there is peace. But climate change is causing resource-based conflicts. These scare away tourists, leading to the decline of the tourism industries.

Now as mentioned earlier, there are millions of people who depend wholly on tourism for their livelihood. It can be hard to believe this, if you work in other sectors – such as public service, agriculture, finance, retail… and so on. Like if, for instance, you work in the food industry for a company like PepsiCo. In that case, you have a system where, on a fortnightly basis, you visit the My pepsico login page, to get your paycheck. The said login page, which is part of PepsiCo’s HR portal at Mypepsico.com is the gateway to the site where PepsiCo staff get to access all their work-related resources in one place…

Now being such a (PepsiCo) employee, it can be very hard for you to envision the life of someone else whose livelihood is predicated on tourism earnings. Yet the reality is that there are millions of such people globally. And those are people whose livelihoods are badly threatened by climate change.

How to Get People to Take the Climate Change Debate Seriously

There are certain steps we can take, to get people to take the climate change debate seriously. Currently, one easily gets the impression that the climate change debate is not taken as seriously as it ought to. People don’t seem to realize just how high the stakes here are. You will hardly find a front-page newspaper story on climate change. In parliaments and other houses of national congress, climate change is treated as a backburner issue. In a nutshell, the climate change debate is not really taken seriously. And this state of affairs is what gives rise to the question as to what we can do, to get people to take the climate change debate seriously. That is where we come to learn that some of the ways in which we can get people to take the climate change debate seriously include by:

  1. Ensuring that the debate is driven by credible people: if the climate change debate is driven by folks who are known to be jokers, or (discredited) conspiracy theorists, it will always be hard for it to be taken seriously.
  2. Backing the arguments with solid facts and figures: rather than being overly verbose, and trying to arouse people’s emotions in an ‘empty’ way, a better idea would be to back arguments with solid facts and figures. That will increase the chances of the arguments advanced in the climate change debate to be taken seriously.
  3. Showing people how climate change is likely to affect them personally: people tend to respond better to things that affect them personally. People tend to take things that affect them personally very seriously. This applies even for things that are perceived as minor or petty. If, for instance, you start talking about gift cards, and someone happens to have gotten one such card (which they are managing online at Mygiftcardsite.com) they will be all ears. Even if their last visit to the gift cards portal – that is, the Mygiftcardsite portal – showed them that their card had only a couple of bucks left, they will nonetheless pay attention. That is because they understand what their stake, however small, is. We can apply the same principle to the climate change debate. It is all about getting people to stop viewing climate change as a ‘global’ phenomenon that affects other people ‘out there’. It is about getting the people to understand that climate change is also a ‘local issue’ — one that is bound to affect them in one way or another, if it is not mitigated. Once they see that sense, they will be inclined to take the climate change debate more seriously.

Getting the Government to Support Climate Change Mitigation

If we are to be successful in mitigate climate change, we need to have government support. Some of the measures that need to be taken, in the name of climate change mitigation, can’t be taken without government support. Therefore government support is very critical. Yet getting government support in these sorts of things isn’t so easy. See, some of the things that need to be done, in the name of climate change mitigation, would inevitably hurt certain interests. That is why we tend to encounter resistance in these matters.

All said and done, to get government support in climate change mitigation, there is one main thing that we need to: namely lobbying. So we need to identify the relevant government officials, and lobby them intensively, to get them to support the climate change mitigation agenda.

Identifying the relevant government officials

The relevant government officials in question here are those who wield real power. If we are to succeed in the climate change mitigation agenda, we will need support from the topmost echelons of the government. This therefore means identifying the people who wield the most power in both the political and bureaucratic arms of the government. It really takes the topmost people, to drive change, and overcome the resistance to change that tends to be inherent. Even when the Nordstrom employees portal, which is reviewed on the employeeloginz website was being set up, the topmost management probably had to be convinced about the soundness of the idea. Only then was the Nordstrom employees portal, at www.mynordstrom.com set up. Similarly, if we are to drive the climate change mitigation agenda forward, we have to sell it successfully to the topmost levels of the political and bureaucratic arms of the government.

Lobbying the government officials

To successfully lobby the government officials, we need to have sound arguments, backed by verifiable facts and figures. It helps a great deal if we can get professional lobbyists to assist in this cause. You have to remember that the folks who are against climate change mitigation measures will also be lobbying furiously, on the other side.

How to Incorporate Lessons About Climate Change into the School Curriculum

One way to increase climate change awareness is by incorporating lessons about climate change into the school curriculum. This way, kids will be taught about climate change from an early age. They will therefore grow up with climate change awareness as part of their innate knowledge. And as such, they will be more inclined to make the changes that are necessary to mitigate climate change effects, without being coerced. In the process of incorporating lessons about climate change into the school curriculum, we will need to:

  1. Make the relevant pedagogical decisions: these include the decision as to what subjects the climate change lessons are to be incorporated into. Also critical is the decision as to what grade the kids are to be introduced to climate change in, and how they are to progress from there. The objective is to have age-appropriate lessons. So decisions have to be made, as to what the appropriate climate change lessons for, say, third graders would be. And what the appropriate climate change lessons for tenth graders would be… and so on.
  2. Simplify climate change concepts: the lessons should be given in a way that the kids can relate to, given their ages and ability to comprehend things.
  3. Educate the teachers on climate: the objective here is to empower the teachers, so as to ensure that they are well placed to be truly effective at the role of teaching kids about climate change.
  4. Carry out a pilot study: pilot studies are always critical in all undertakings. It is only through pilot studies that concepts can be tested out, and potential challenges identified. Even Lowe’s (the retail chain), probably had to undertake a pilot study, before launching the Lowes Kronos employee portal. In a similar manner, before rolling out the lessons about climate change in the nationwide school curriculum, it is important to first undertake a pilot study.
  5. Roll out the climate change lessons fully: if the pilot studies are successful, you can now proceed to roll out the climate change lessons, that will have been incorporated into the (nationwide) school curriculum.